A Remark on an Endpoint Kato-ponce Inequality

نویسندگان

  • LOUKAS GRAFAKOS
  • VIRGINIA NAIBO
چکیده

This note introduces bilinear estimates intended as a step towards an L∞-endpoint Kato-Ponce inequality. In particular, a bilinear version of the classical Gagliardo-Nirenberg interpolation inequalities for a product of functions is proved.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Kato-ponce Inequality

In this article we revisit the inequalities of Kato and Ponce concerning the L norm of the Bessel potential J = (1 − ∆) (or Riesz potential D = (−∆)) of the product of two functions in terms of the product of the L norm of one function and the L norm of the the Bessel potential J (resp. Riesz potential D) of the other function. Here the indices p, q, and r are related as in Hölder’s inequality ...

متن کامل

A short remark on the result of Jozsef Sandor

It is pointed out that, one of the results in the recently published article, ’On the Iyengar-Madhava Rao-Nanjundiah inequality and it’s hyperbolic version’ [3] by J´ozsef S´andor is logically incorrect and new corrected result with it’s proof is presented.

متن کامل

Bi-parameter Paraproducts

In the first part of the paper we prove a bi-parameter version of a well known multilinear theorem of Coifman and Meyer. As a consequence, we generalize the Kato-Ponce inequality in nonlinear PDE. Then, we show that the double bilinear Hilbert transform does not satisfy any L estimates.

متن کامل

ar X iv : m at h . C A / 0 31 03 67 v 1 2 3 O ct 2 00 3 BI - PARAMETER PARAPRODUCTS

In the first part of the paper we prove a bi-parameter version of a well known multilinear theorem of Coifman and Meyer. As a consequence, we generalize the Kato-Ponce inequality in nonlinear PDE. Then, we show that the double bilinear Hilbert transform does not satisfy any L estimates.

متن کامل

On a Generalization of an Inequality Of

G. E. Forsythe, who edited the translation of Kantorovich's paper, included the following remark about this footnote: "It is not clear to me that Kantorovich's inequality really is a special case of that of Polya and Szego." Examining the relation between the two inequalities more closely we found that this remark is well justified and can be made even more specific in that the inequality of Po...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013